The Natural Racquet – Dear Diary Pt. 4

The weather continues to be terrible, meaning I have not had as much time to continue with the playtest as I expected.  However, it has been a couple of weeks since my last diary entry and there has been some progress.

Two weeks ago I used the racquet to warm-up for a league match and started out with it.  After two games I realized that I was focusing too much on changing grips and was too worried about shots I had not practiced (volleys and overheads in particular) and went to my normal racquet.  I ended up losing a close match due to my weak forehand and in retrospect suspect I may have had a better result if I had been brave and gone for it with The Natural.

This Sunday I went into the doubles match fully committed to using The Natural.  After warm-up one of my opponents commented that he had played tennis for many years and had never seen anyone play with a two handled racquet.  Little did he know he was about to be defeated by this strange looking stick.

Because I had some serving practice and repetitions, I found the grip changing issue to finally be resolving itself.  Throughout the course of this entire 3 set match, I was only caught once with an unchanged grip.  Best of all I did not have to concentrate as much as switching is becoming more and more automatic.

I did hit more double faults than normal, but made it through the 3 – set match against very solid opponents with only experiencing a single break of serve.  I attribute this success largely to my ability to follow-up with a forehand that is not always defensive in nature.  I hit the forehand with confidence when using this racquet, which is a huge plus for me.  Still the serve needs more work.  I need to learn to hit a higher percentage of first serves and not as many double faults (I probably hit a half dozen during the match..typcially I will hit 1 or 2).  I also still need to work on my ability to move the serve around the box.  Directional control is not as precise on serve as it is with my single handed racquet and my reverse kick serve (pronated action) is nowhere to be found.  I suspect all will come with additional practice…once the weather breaks.

Returns of serve and groundies were solid throughout the match.  Best of all my forehand was much more effective and lobs were still precise and deep.  Backhand  was not as lethal as normal, but when coupled with a forehand that could pose a legitimate offensive threat, my overall ground game was vastly improved.

Overheads were not hit with power and confidence…mostly because I lacked any practice in hitting them and am still not sure what grip to use.  One overhead sailed long, the rest were in play.  Forehand volleys were solid, but I still lack confidence in backhand volleys.  In the third set I did switch back to my regular racquet for two games when my partner was serving and I was at net.  I felt I was not posing a threat with The Natural because I was afraid of making an error in volleying.  This too should fade with time and additional experience.

I mentioned that the serve lacked variety, however, in my previous diary entry I wrote about that crazy underhanded serve with incredible spin.  In a critical service game in the 3rd set after fighting off 5 break points I finally earned an ad-in chance.  At this point in time I decided to use the only change of pace that I knew I could hit and layed that serve upon my opponents.  It turned out to be only my second service ace of the day.  Highly effective, though not appreciated by the opposition.

In my last entry I mentioned the longer versions of  The Natural.  I decided that for my game, the 27″ version is my preference.  I may give the longer version another go in the future, but for now the 27″ version is my personal choice.  It should be noted that the Battistone brothers prefer the 29″ version.

Guts and Glory Tennis now offers demos of the 27″ and 28″ versions of this racquet for our local customers who may be interested in giving it a whirl.  It’s a lot of fun and so far in league play we are undefeated ( 1 – 0 ) when using it!

NOTE: This is the fourth diary entry in an ongoing series, please check our blog site for the previous entries.

The Natural Racquet – Dear Diary Pt. 3

Since our last entry, bad weather has prevented us from significant play time.  However, we have been able to get out for a couple of hitting sessions and feel it is time to update our experiences with the playtesting of this racquet.

First…local customers please take note, Guts and Glory Tennis now has demos of The Natural available for playtesting purposes. Contact us if you are interested in taking one to the court for your personal playtest!

Having come to the revelation that hitting the forehand with one hand offered advantages for me, I set out to explore this phenomena further.  (If you did not read the previous diary entries, I began the playtesting adventure attempting to hit a two-handed forehand).  So far, in hitting sessions with live opponents and the ball machine, I have found more spin, power and control off the forehand side with The Natural than any racquet I have hit.  I’m enjoying the experience immensely!!! It should be noted the forehand has always been my weakest side and quite frankly a major liability in my game.  The confidence I am gaining in hitting forehands with The Natural is amazing.  I have to attribute the difference to the off-centered handle.  The 24 degree angle of the racquet handle possesses magic for me.  With The Natural on one-handed shots the hand is actually BEHIND the ball at impact.  For reasons I am completely unable to explain, this makes a world of difference to me in terms of control and power.  In short, I am beginning to believe my forehand liability may become a strength with the aid of this racquet.

Now I have to bring the rest of my game up to speed to actually use the racquet in a match.  I am seriously considering using it this weekend, but only if I am able to get enough practice in during the coming week and can overcome some of the aspects that still are not natural for me.  The serve, while offering added power, needs work because the contact point has to be higher than my normal point of contact.  I also have lingering questions about overheads and volleys.  I still have trouble remembering to switch the grip after serving and am thinking the reverse grip switch will be necessary when hitting overheads.  I have not hit any overheads in match play and need to get out and hit some soon!

Yesterday our demos of the 28″ and 29″ frames arrived.  I took the 28″ frame to the courts and used it for serving ONLY.  I could definitely feel a difference.  The contact point had to be higher to be effective and I was more prone to hitting long with the longer version.  I also fear the added length may not be arm-friendly, but will need to test this.

As I was preparing to leave the practice court a bizarre, yet exciting,  discovery was made.  I grabbed a couple of spare balls to hit  into the corner across the net with the others to be scooped.  In so doing I hit them underhand since I had been serving for an hour.  Holy smoley…did that just happen???  The spin was so prevalent that the ball landed and hopped as if the strings were of the outlawed spaghetti stringing variety.  Of course this piqued my curiosity and I found that with the serving grip and extreme downward motion some crazy biting spin could be imparted.  The hop is absolutely nuts. There is clearly potential for this to be a potent weapon as a change of pace serve as well as a change of pace shot in rallies.  This revelation certainly warrants additional exploration.  The 24 degree angle of the handle makes the extreme and unpredictable spin production possible.

When will I use the racquet in a match?  How will my opponents react?  Will I find the extra length versions superior to the 27″ version?  Will I master the crazy undercut spin action?  Will I ever grow comfortable with the grip changes?  All of these questions and more will be addressed in future blog/diary entries.  Please check back for updates!

MSV Hepta – Twist

MSV Hepta – Twist has hit the US shores and judging from the astonishingly high number of email inquiries we are receiving, tennis players from coast to coast are eager to learn more about the newest offering from Mauve Sports.

In late 2009 we playtested this product along with several local playtesters.  The results were overwhelmingly positive.  Concurrent to our playtests there was a world-wide playtest run through Stringforum.net that yielded similar results.  (Check out that site for specifics from those playtesters. Our review only uses comments from our playtesting team.)

First the construction details.  The MSV Hepta – Twist is composed of the same poly-based material as the wildly popular, best-selling and award-winning Focus – Hex ™.  However, instead of being extruded using a hexagonal die cast, this particular string uses a heptagonal base structure of 7 sides.  The magic is then added through a new “twisting” process that is now being used in many poly-based strings.  This process allows a rough texture that bites the ball with both the mains and crosses.

The end result is a string that offers the comfortable and familiar feel of the Focus – Hex ™ with some advantages.  When using as a full setup, the spin production tends to be greater.  Many of our local playtesters made comments about how the ball was doing amazing things off the ground.  We experienced sharper, harder biting slice off both wings.  Topspin was plentiful and topspin lobs were a joy to watch hit deep in the court and then kick up high. Given the core materials of the string we were surprised that tension maintenance outpeformed the Focus – Hex ™.  We are not exactly sure why this occurs, but suspect it may have something to do with the twisting part of the manufacturing process, a step the Focus – Hex ™ does not go through.

This string is available in 3 colors; black, white and red.  It comes in 4 gauges, 16 (1.30mm), 17 (1.25mm) 17L (1.20mm) and 18 (1.15mm).  Individual sets are currently on sale through 1/25/10 and will resume regular pricing of $10.90 per set at that time.  660′ reels are also available at a sale price of $98.90 with no end date set at the time this blog entry is being written. The regular pricing will be $109.90 per reel.  Note that we do offer volume discounts to USRSA members as well as school coaches and USPTA teaching professionals on all our MSV string offerings.

We have been asked multiple times how this string compares to other products.  For those curious about the WeissCANNON TurboTwist, it is an entirely different experience.  The TurboTwist stands alone with unique power and feel that defies poly-based string standards.  The Hepta – Twist will provide a more traditional crisp feel and the spin potential may be slightly higher with the MSV Hepta – Twist due to added crispness.  Both are outstanding products, but other than using twist technology, they are not all that similar.  We have begun experimenting with those who had previously used Hex in hybrid setup for additional power and comfort. (They used a syn gut cross).  We are finding that the TurboTwist can often be used in place of the syn gut because of the comfort and power it provides.  Early feedback is this particular blend of strings is a clear winner for this group of players, with the downside being a greater overall cost.

The Signum Pro Tornado is another string customers are asking about.  While similarities exist, we are hearing from playtesters that the Tornado offers a stiffer feel.  We have two testers who have used both and they are reporting that both are solid performers, but the MSV Hepta – Twist is livlier and more responsive.  The Hepta-Twist will also keep more of your hard-earned dollars in your pocket, an important consideration given the current state of the economy.

As for the first book of the bible string…not even in the same league.

Bottom line, if you enjoy the MSV Focus – Hex ™, you are apt to enjoy this string as well.  If you have not used MSV Focus or Focus – Hex ™ , but have used poly-based strings you will likely find a pleasant hitting experience with outstanding spin.  Comfort is good  and the string still provides a crisp response.  If you prefer a softer feel, the MSV EVO line provides that option.  In terms of overall performance for those who like crisp and comfortable poly-based strings with amazing spin and control, the Hepta-Twist from Mauve Sports is the string to try.  Get some before your opponents do!

The Natural Racquet – Dear Diary pt. 2

Tonight was the first live action with The Natural racquet.  As promised in the previous entry, I am going to use this blog as as a diary to fully document my personal journey of discovery with this racquet.

The night began with my teammates laughing hysterically at the silly looking racquet.  I could have cared less, because someday that racquet is going to whoop all of them!

During warmups I was able to rally decently.  The two-handed forehand remained awkward and very low powered.  The weather was cold so that impacted the liveliness of the ball, but the two-fisted forehand was definitely low powered and short.  We did not warm up long and immediately launched into doubles action.

As I began live action doubles I noticed less control than with my trusty Black Star, but this was to be expected.  I was able to hit some solid backhand returns, but forehands remained an issue.  The forehand is my weakest wing and so far The Natural racquet was doing nothing to improve it.  In fact, it was worse.

Serves continued to surprise me with the amount of pop I was getting. Definitely more power than any racquet I have used, with the possible exception of the Pure Drive.  The only problem, and it was definitely a SIGNIFICANT one…was the grip.  Remembering to switch the grip after serving was a chore, and not one that I achieved well.  I only remembered about 40% of the time.  Using the racquet to volley and hit ground strokes with the same handle position as serving produces wildly uncontrolled results for me.  In my case the racquet must be flipped immediately after serving in order to have any hope of control. It will take time to learn to do this, definitely not second nature.

My MxD partner grew concerned that playing with The Natural Racquet would negatively impact my play this weekend.  I went back to my Black Star for a set.  She was right…it felt a bit strange after using The Natural all night, but I was able to adjust.  I was surprised by how awkward my racquet felt initially, but I adjusted and we won.  She was happy.  Glad I switched.

A teammate arrived a bit later into the session and I moved over to hit singles.  My opponent is an EXCELLENT singles player and while rallying with him I went to one hand on the forehand side.  To my shock, amazement and delight I was hitting better forehands than I have hit in quite some time.  Control, pace and depth were all there.  I was thrilled with the results with one hand.  My two fisted backhand was solid, maybe a bit less than with my regular racquet, but close.  The forehand, however, improved significantly.  Volleys were respectable and much easier than I expected.

Then we began playing dingles, a game where the serve and volley is prevalent.  In the context of dingles, the racquet lost some magic.  Serves were good, but I constantly struggled to remember to switch the grip after serving resulting  in some wild second shots.  On return of serve and coming in, I was better, but felt strangely out-of-synch.  My game relies on precision and I wasn’t finding it with the racquet in dingles. More practice is needed.  I eventually switched back to my Black Star to finish out dingles and get ready for our weekend match.

I ended the night very pleased.  The racquet played soft and absorbed shock well, even with a full poly-based string setup in cold temperatures.  I ended up discovering that a single handed forehand worked well for me — a vast improvement over my forehand with a single handled racquet.  Overheads were few and far between, but they were problematic as was the process of switching grips after serving.  I am certain both can be overcome with additional practice. The power and consistency I found in rallying with the singles player gave me great optimism about the future potential of this racquet.  There are still many kinks to work out, but I really enjoyed the feel it offered and the strong rallies.  Points, especially the shot following the serve and to a lesser extent the return of serve require more work.

So there you have it…the good, the bad and the ugly.  For a first live session the racquet exceeded my expectations and I am eager to continue leaning how to use it.  It is not yet ready to make an appearance in a live match.  It’ll need a few more practice session before it’ll be ready for use to take out a real opponent.  Bottom line, I hadn’t experienced this much fun and joy in testing equipment in a long time and I see a lot of potential for this racquet in the context that I want to use it as well as quite a few others.

Guts and Glory Tennis plans to  make this racquet available to our customers.  The racquets will retail for $200 online.  We will offer FREE custom stringing with the purchase using any string or hybrid from our WeissCANNON or MSV family of string products.  If you are interested in purchasing The Natural tennis racquet, please contact us.  We will offer special incentives for our local and established online customers.  We plan to have demos available in the coming weeks for local customers.  Be watching for future updates as we continue to chronicle our experiences with “The Natural” tennis racquet.

The Natural Tennis Racquet – A Diary

It has been several weeks since our last blog entry.  Our customers have been excellent to us during these difficult economic times and we have been blessed to continue growing.  The downside of growth is there is less time to devote to non-essential business functions such as blogging.  2010 will likely find fewer blog entries from us.  While we attempted to post weekly in 2009, we are aiming for twice per month in 2010.  We hope you will continue reading and enjoying when we are able to post.  If you don’t already follow us on Twitter, we invite you to do so.  Micro-blogging (or tweeting) is less time consuming and while we have reduced our tweets, we will keep our followers abreast of twitter specials and deals via that medium during 2010.  Now onto the heart of the post…

Always on the prowl for arm-friendly racquets we came across a double handled racquet called “The Natural” tennis racquet.  The specs were interesting to us so we began researching the racquet.  After some initial reading we learned there was not much information posted about this unusal racquet.  They do have a web site and there are a couple of threads on discussion boards, but that is all the information available.  (Some interesting videos on YouTube also exist.)

We decided to see for ourselves if the racquet might be an alternative for some people.  It arrived two days ago. Our first order of business was to “pimp it out.”  In other words we added a stringbed of red mains and black crosses of the new MSV Hepta-Twist (soon to be available and soon to be a blog topic).  Next we wrapped the grips with purple and lime overwrap and used some red and yellow finishing tape.  Our goal was “gawdy as possible.”  Afterall, we want to attract attention when using this puppy.

Because of the scarcity of information we decided to make an online blog diary of our experience with this racquet.  Our first official hitting session will be this evening where we will form some initial opinions and report back in diary form, however yesterday, January 13, curiosity got the better of us and we took it to the courts at lunch.  Impressions below.

JANUARY 13, 2010 Today we share some preliminary observations after a brief hitting session against a wall and some serving practice.  Note:  Live action will be tomorrow, 1/14/10.

1.  It will take some time to adjust to the angle of the handles.  It is unrealistic to expect to be able to hit at 100% efficiency with this frame out of the box.  It will require some adjustments and muscle memory will have to be relearned.  I suspect it will take several hours of hitting sessions before I am comfortable using this racquet in match play.

2.  Some will use the racquet with the goal of hitting one hand off of each side.  In my case I am learning to hit two handed off of both sides.  I already hit a two-handed backhand and hitting that side with this racquet took just minor adjustments.  Felt really good.  Can’t wait to see how it performs in live action later today.  The two-handed forehand was very akward. Probably because it was not as natural for me.  Will have to work on it. Hitting with one hand was more comfortable for me, and I could rally against the wall with control using one hand, but that is not my goal.

3.  I now understand why it comes in 27″, 28″ and 29″ options.  After just a short wall session, I believe if hitting with two hands, the longer options may be better, although I am not sure what the extra length may mean for arm health. The model I am testing is the 27″ model with the 4 1/4″ grip.  Typically I use 4 1/2, but with two hands the smaller size does not bother me…so far.

4.  Used some different muscle groups in shoulders and upper back.  I expected to be sore today, but surprisingly I am not.  Must be due to the post workout chocolate milk chaser kicking in!

5.  The angled handles are intriguing.  I can see some distinct possibilites of additional leverage on groundstrokes, but it will require some grip work.  This is an area that definitely needs additional exploration.

6.  Serves.  The first dozen or so found the bottom of the net or the fence.  I tried serving with both the front and back handles.  I ultimately chose to focus on using the front handle.  The contact point has to be higher with this racquet when using the front handle in order to clear the net.  Ultimately that is GOOD for power.  By hitting at a higher point of contact, more power is generated.  The angle actually helps here.  I was impressed with the zip I found on serve…that caught me by surprise.  Control and placement will require additional practice due to the new contact point.  Also pronating with this racquet was not as easy for me.  Again, this was a short hitting session consisting of only 5 dozen or so serves.  There is reason to be very optimistic about the serving potential for this racquet.

I came away from the session realizing that one has to be committed to learning how to use the racquet.  It’s not like demoing a typical racquet off the store shelf.  Thus we will keep updating this diary to share our experience with those who may be considering trying this racquet for themselves.

Thank you!

For our loyal readers, we apologize for the long delay between blog entries.  As many of you know we are a small family owned business.  Our size allows us to be familiar and friendly with our customers.  It allows us to provide the personal and friendly service of days gone by when the customers interacted directly with the owners of the business.  We greatly value this personal interaction and suspect it is part of the reason that our customers continue to choose us and refer us to their friends and teammates.

The downside of this business model is there is not always enough hours in the day to complete all tasks.  Because of the insane amount of Christmas gift orders we have been processing, there has not been enough time to prepare blog entries of substance or mirth. We hope our readers will understand.

We want to thank our customers for keeping us busy throughout the year.  2009 was much better than we would have ever imagined.  We entered the year fully prepared to feel the wrath of the economy but much to our surprise and delight our business experienced rapid growth.  We are extremely grateful to you for giving us the opportunity to serve you as a supplier of tennis strings, gifts and racquet services.

Tomorrow, 12/17/09, we are scheduled to receive a huge order of products as we prepare for 2010.  Some of the products will be new and you will be able to read about them here.  In order to warehouse these products we have some renovations to perform.  We will begin our renovations during the holidays when tennis activity is historically slow.

Guts and Glory Tennis will be closed 12/18/09.  Our goal is to reopen by 12/28/09.  During this period you are welcome to place online orders with us, but please realize that orders will not be processed and shipped prior to 12/29/09.  We will also not be staffing our phones during this period, but we will attempt to read and respond to emails at least once each day, so if you have an urgent question it is best to submit it to us via the contact us option on our web site.

We look forward to continue to provide you with the outstanding products and services you have come to expect from us in 2010!  Thank you for your continued business and we wish each of our customers a wonderful and prosperous 2010.

Cyber Monday Sales Spectacular

Today is Cyber Monday.  Please visit our website and follow the Cyber Monday link in the left menu column for some wild savings.  Hope you enjoy!

www.ggtennis.com

Going Rogue in the stringing workshop = “Pillow Top Tri-Brid” ™

What you see pictured above is a stringing method that has the potential to shake, rattle and roll modern-day stringing conventions while shattering the accepted two-piece paradigm.  At Guts and Glory Tennis, we are “going rogue” in 2010!

We call this process the “Pillow-Top Tri -Brid.” ™ We are currently concluding playtests.  The early feedback is overwhelmingly positive and we are confident we will have all the data and revisions needed to make this EXCLUSIVE method available to our customers in 2010.

What you see is the evolution of a concept that was birthed September 7, 2005.  On that day I had a long discussion with the parents of a highly ranked junior player.  He preferred the feel and performance of multifilament strings.  However, with his western grip and aggressive style of play the durability was unacceptable.  He did not like the feel of full poly-based strings, but could adapt to a poly-based/multi hybrid.  Problem was the poly-based strings were chewing through the multis rapidly.  The parents asked if there was ANYTHING possible we could do to add some durability while simultaneously offering the desired playability  so they would not have to restring as often.

We went to the drawing board.  With the hybrid, it was the center crosses that were breaking from friction.  We wondered if there might be a method where the center strings (mains and crosses) could all consist of the durable poly-based strings and be surrounded by multis for added feel.  The resulting conclusion was an experimental three piece “tri-brid” we created especially for this player.  His name was Harrison and we called it the “Harrison Hybrid.”

Soon word of the “Harrison Hybrid” had spread through the junior ranks and we were performing this method for several junior players.  The execution was admittedly awkward due to the fact we had not been able to find a pattern that worked on a majority of frames.  In the coming months Harrison’s parents would purchase a stringing machine, begin stringing themselves and go back to a traditional poly-based/synthetic hybrid.  The other juniors using the method slowly switched racquets to those which could not be strung with this method and thus the “Harrison Hybrid” became a seldom used method in our shop.

This October at the Grand Slam Stringers Symposium in Orlando, I met a great guy and brilliant stringer named Roger.  We were bantering about stringing stuff and I mentioned using a tri-brid to him.  To my shock and amazement, he not only knew exactly what I was talking about, but his racquet was currently strung as a tri-brid.  In discussing his stringing method and pattern, I noted some key differences from what I had been using.  Most notably, he was using the poly-based strings in a larger proportion than I originally used.  By increasing the percentage of poly-based string surface it was possible to be successfully installed on almost all frames that used traditional grommet systems.  (Sorry, Prince port-frame owners!)  Roger had re-ignited my interest in exploring this method in greater detail.  When I returned from the conference, I immediately began experimenting with it.  If playability was proven to perform as projected I knew the next step would be to find a way to incorporate it into our arsenal of racquet tuning and stringing techniques.

The “Pillow Top Tri-Brid” ™ method is truly dynamic and exciting.  It can incorporate and neatly blend the playing properties of 3 strings into the stringbed.  In the image above we have used 3 different colored strings for illustration purposes.  The outer later of strings (white) is the key to this method.  These are the multis.  They essentially act as a pillow-top or cloud.  Their main purpose is to absorb the shock of off-center hits and also help absorb and dampen the shock of shots hit in the sweetspot.  By using multis in approximately 1/3 of the stringbed, we hoped to achieve more feel and touch than full poly can offer.  The desired outcome was to create the same or more playability with this setup than a traditional poly-based/multi hybrid.

The center mains (red)  in the above image are hexagonal poly-based strings.  We decided to playtest these with the desire of getting the maximum amount of spin.  We crossed them with a new poly-based twist string (black).  With the explosion of new poly-based choices, there are a plethora of possible combinations when mixing the properties of 3 different strings.  Add to these the completely unique playing properties of the WeissCANNON TurboTwist (a twisted poly-based string with high elasticity offering feel of a synthetic) and we literally can provide cornucopia of playability options for our customers.  (NOTE: It is also possible and probably more common to use the same poly-based string for the center mains and crosses.)

Our exclusive “Pillow Top Tri-Brid” ™ has evolved tremendously over the past few weeks.  Because a three piece pattern uses 6 knots and knots are where tension is lost we had to find a way to address the issue so that tension loss would not impact playability.  Making sure tension does not leak is especially important with the red mains and the final black cross because they are in the meaty part of the stringbed.  Using a string meter we were able to identify the amount of tension loss in tying off at these points and adjust the tension by increasing it on the pulls that would be tied off.

Next we discovered that using a consistent reference tension led to uneven stiffness based upon type of string and length of pull.  We were also concerned that a higher percentage of poly-based strings would reduce the desired shock dampening properties of the setup.  Using the tenants of proportional stringing we have been able to make adjustments that allow the multis to achieve all of the desirable characteristics we were seeking.

We want to thank our playtesters for helping us as we have perfected the “Pillow Top Tri-Brid” ™.  (We wish Harrison was NOT in Brazil as his feedback would be interesting!) Through their feedback we have been able to revise and hone the process to something that is nearly ready to hit the mainstream.  The results to date, according to our playtest team, have exceeded our expectations.  The playtesters have been delighted with the results and 100%  are eager to continue stringing with this method going forward.  We are extremely excited to bring “Pillow Top Tri-Brid” ™  (PTTB)  to our local stringing customers in the coming weeks.  (Watch out 2010, we are going ROGUE!)

Players seeking the performance of poly-based/multi hybrids are the desired audience for this stringing process.  The multi will add comfort and added playability while durability will be vastly superior to traditional hybrids.  The proportional component we have added coupled with the possible combination of string types will allow the process to be highly customized to meet the desired performance of the customer.

Because each frame is different we need to create a custom map for optimizing the performance of each racquet.  Currently this is biggest bug in the ointment.  For the initial stringing we need to string the frame and measure the results.  We then take notes, cut out strings, restring with adjusted tension where needed and record the results.  This will increase the initial cost to customers.   We will have to explore ways to reduce costs for our customers.

We do not anticipate using the “Pillow Top Tri-Brid” ™ on port-style frames because it would require us to tie off on an open port.  While we do not believe this would cause damage to the frame, we also do not know how the knot may move/react. This is something we still have to test to see if it is possible…I mean since we’re going rogue, we may as well go all the way!

NOTE to stringers and customers:  The “Pillow Top Tri-Brid” ™ requires opening new tie-off holes and while it will do no damage to your racquet frame, we are pretty sure using this process will void the remaining manufacturer’s warranty.

NEW NOTE (11/25/09): We have been alerted that some stringers are posting their version of a tri-brid pattern on message boards.  We have reviewed the patterns posted and they are NOT the pattern we use.  PLEASE keep the following in mind.  When stringing the mains, they are strung IN SEQUENCE no more than 2 ahead on either side…keeping in accordance with safe stringing practices.  Specifically stringing outer mains and later filling in has potential to damage a frame and we in no way endorse or advocate this practice when using a tri-brid pattern.

The “Iron Mike” Turkey Fryer

LOS ANGELES, CA – Just in time for the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, the highly innovative folks from Ronco, are about to unleash an all out infomercial assault.  Ron Popeil refers to the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer as “the most significant impact product ever introduced from the Ronco stable.” An impressive declaration from the man who brought us such memorable and revered products as “The Pocket Fisherman, ” “Mister Microphone” and the “Inside the Shell Egg Scrambler!”

Ronco has been viewed by industry analysts as a fading star in the food appliance and gadgetry market ever since the introduction of the George Foreman Grill which has flourished under a competing label. As the “Lean Mean Grilling Machine” continues devouring Ronco’s market share, the company is clearly becoming increasingly desperate to survive and to somehow reclaim the heavyweight title of “Appliance and Gadgetry King” it once wore so proudly.

Toward that end, the Ronco public relations machine has been working overtime cranking out publicity that is already generating a huge appetite for Ronco’s newest product.

“We’re putting the final touches on a knockout infomercial that will be ready to hit the living rooms of billions next week!” states Popeil, the crown prince of hyperbole.

The infomercial brings a new, irreverent, and cutting edge, in-your-face type of approach to the infomercial genre. Who better to serve as the spokesperson than Mike Tyson? “A potentially explosive, dangerous and extremely combustible product such as the turkey fryer demands a spokesperson equally as combustible and unpredictable. It’s simply a stroke of unabashed marketing genius!” proclaims Advertising Week magazine who previewed the infomercial and marketing campaign in their most recent edition.

The concept represents innovative thinking at its finest and most devious. Ronco is positioning the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer as the world’s most dangerous appliance and are playing up the elements of danger as a desired selling point. Since men tend to be the consumers who purchase and use turkey fryers, they are pitching the product to appeal to an exaggerated sense of machismo. “If you don’t cook your holiday turkeys in the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer, you obviously are deficient of an X chromosome!”

The diagram below demonstrates the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer in action and at its best–a device that boldly claims to have invented and patented the exclusive “char-frying” process.

Mmmm…Mmmm!!! Char-frying a turkey in the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer is the only way to go! Seared inside the charred exterior is delectably moist turkey meat, the likes of which you have never before tasted…”it’s a knockout!” proclaims Mike Tyson himself in the infomercial. Unlike conventional turkey fryers, the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer relies on heating the oil to a blistering 934 degrees Fahrenheit.

1. Step one (left) shows the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer ready to receive the holiday fowl.

2. Step two shows the bird in the earliest stages of cooking. Remarkably the process only takes 25 – 30 seconds per pound. A 15 pound bird is done in an impressive 7.5 minutes.

3. Step three shows the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer in full action and glory, just seconds before dinner is to be removed.

Using the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer adds elements of fun, danger and intrigue, to an otherwise tepid, time consuming, and boring process. When using the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer , the turkey is actually cooked faster than the mashed potatoes or any of the trimmings for that matter! No more need spending hours basting and carefully watching the bird. With the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer , just pop in the turkey and within minutes, you are ready to eat…assuming you survive.

Consistent with the brilliant marketing and public relations plan, the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer will be available for a single payment of $65.00. “A three installment payment plan for a device as potentially lethal as this just doesn’t make sense…we’ll never see the final two payments,” quips a Ronco spokesperson. “Compared to other competing fryers on the market, which are obviously not nearly as dangerous and don’t fully utilize the exclusive patented “Char-frying” process, this is a steal!”

But wait, there’s more! In addition to the Iron Mike Turkey Fryer , those making the purchase in the next 30 days will also receive a free flame retardant suit as pictured above and a turbo jet fire extinguisher…a $210.00 value! But that’s not all, Ronco is even throwing in a Fuji disposable camera so you can capture what could very well be your loved one’s final moments as he heroically removes the turkey for the family dinner.

 

(This piece was originally created a few years ago.  It has not appeared on our blog site and we thought our readers might enjoy it.  Happy Thanksgiving to you and your families.)

Tensioning mains: Variance on accepted practices discovered!

According to the United States Racquet Stringer’s Association, it is acceptable to pull tension 2 – 3 ahead on the main strings.  Stringer’s who follow this practice regularly are able to achieve CRT and MRT status.  While considered acceptable industry practice, we are not convinced this technique creates the most consistent stringbed possible.  As a result of this belief we have altered our technique to one where we pull tension on each alternate main as a matter of routine.

With the use of a Stringmeter and ERT we have been testing this premise in our shop.  While tensioning mains 2 or 3 ahead before alternating sides we are able to achieve consistent ERT (stringbed stiffness) readings.  However, we have discovered that when measuring individual strings with a Stringmeter that an interesting phenomena exists.  It seems that parrallel strings (i.e. main #4 on each half of frame) offer identical readings when strings are tensioned using a strict alternating method of tensioning. (Alternating tension on each side going no more than 1 ahead).  However, when using a method of pulling tension 2 or 3 ahead the reading on parrallel strings can vary by 3 – 10 pounds!  The amount of variance is not consistent, or at least with our limited testing we can not identify a pattern or formula.  What we can identify is that a technique consisting of tensioning 2 -3 main strings before alternating sides creates a level of variance that can be measured with a Stringmeter, but does not register on an ERT.

Of course this raises some key questions for stringers.  Can players perceive this variance or is it insignificant if the overall stringbed stiffness is consistent?  What causes this variance?

Our response to the later, is that this variance could very likely be caused by frame flex.  In spite of secure 6 point mounting systems of today’s advanced machines, the racquet will experience some degree of flex while being strung in any machine (with the possible exception of True Tension machines).  We hypothesize that the uneven tensioning creates a flex situation that leads to results with undesired variances.

At this point in time we are unclear as to how or if this variance can alter the play of the racquet.  What we have been able to do is to identify it as an area that needs additional study.  We will need to call on the industry physicists, engineers and the USRSA to explore this further and determine if it is a factor that is or is not important for generating a stringbed that produces ultimate playability.

Until more information is generated, our customers can be assured that all racquets strung by us will be done focusing on the most consistent outcome, even if it extends the time to complete the stringjob by a few minutes.

Should poly-based strings be prestretched?

Today’s blog topic comes from a frequently asked question received via email and telephone from our customers.  We are often asked about prestretching poly-based strings.  While there are varying opinions on the topic, our position is resoundingly firm.  “Poly-based strings should NOT be prestretched.”

Because poly-based strings offer excellent durability from friction wear, the perception is that they are a macho product.

Impervious to beatings…
Strong like a bull…
Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound…
(You get the picture)

In reality, poly-based strings are more delicate and fragile than most strngers and players realize.  They need to be handled very carefully during the installation process…Especially many of today’s new poly-based strings that include chemicals and additives designed to make them softer. Poly-based strings should be treated as carefully, or moreso, than natural gut during the stringing process.  Failure to treat them properly can result in premature breakage and cause the string not to perform  to its potential.

For poly-based strings elasticity, (the ability to stretch out and return to original form), is supremely important.  Stringing at too high of a tension sucks much of the elasticity out of poly-based strings and prestretching has the same effect.

Proponents argue that tension loss can be reduced by prestretching.  They argue that the 13% – 20% initial tension loss can be reduced/better managed with a prestretch.  This may be true.  However, there is a HUGE FALSE ASSUMPTION lingering around the stringing universe that loss of tension = loss of playability.  In some cases, this can be true, but in most cases it is not.  I believe the perceived relationship between loss of tension and loss of playability is overblown and misunderstood.  In fact, Cross and Lindsey in The Physics and Technology of Tennis found that strings maintained their energy, resiliency and elasticity even after experiencing tension loss.  “We found that the energy loss was not zero, but close enough to zero to make no significant difference in the calculations.” (Chapter 30)

Tension loss can easily be measured with many of today’s tools.  It is perceived to be evil.  While there is no denying that it is a factor that can alter playability of a racquet, we would argue in the world of poly-based strings that tension loss is not as critical of a factor as loss of elasticity.  It is the ELASTICITY of poly-based strings that allow them to offer the desired performance.  PRESTRETCHING can damage/reduce this elasticity which is the main reason we do not advocate prestretching poly-based strings.

As our blog readers know, we could ramble onward ad nauseum.  Our goal was to keep this entry short while providing some context/support for our response.

“No, poly-based strings should not be prestretched.”

Please feel free to leave your thoughts and comments in the designated section below.

Dishing the dirt…leaked excerpts from Agassi’s new book.(?)

Last week the tennis world was dealt an unexpected surprise as Andre Agassi’s publisher released a disturbing preview of Agassi’s autobiography.  It seems that one of the world’s most beloved players was a frequent user of crystal methamphetamine in the late 1990’s.

Our crack research staff has uncovered a source who claims to have met a person who is the cousin of a friend of a pizza delivery guy who has read an early draft of the autobiography.  This source reports to the mighty RACQUETY-YAK blog team that the usage of illegal drugs and subsequent weave of lies is just the tip of the iceberg.

If our source is accurate, on November 9th, when the autobiography “Open” goes on sale, we may learn more shocking revelations that promise to keep an army of ATP tour PR professionals busy for weeks.  In a rare move, the code of silence is broken and dirt is dished on many of Agassi’s contemporaries.   We have an exclusive preview of these revelations for our blog readers.

- In Chapter 3 we learn  Jim Courier was a poker buddy of Bruno Rebeu (Famous French Tennis Umpire).  Jim and Bruno regularly yukked it up at private monthly poker parties.  Bruno would introduce a disguised Courier to participants as “Harvey…Carrot top’s older brother.”

- In Chapter 5 it is unveiled that  Pat Cash  smuggled Cuban cigars to many major tournament executives in exchange for favorable draws, start times and court assignments.  He also enjoyed playing tennis in the buff.

- Chapter 7 supposedly reveals that  Stefan Edberg tortured kittens.  Who’d have thought?

- In Chapter 8 we learn Boris Becker listened to Shania Twain songs repeatedly on his walkman to mentally prepare for matches.

- Chapter 10 details  Michael Chang as a reputed ladies man.

- The 11th Chapter features claims that James Scott Connors secretly enjoyed bubble baths and pedicures the evening before big matches.

- Chapter 12 gives the lurid details of Ivan Lendl’s private hell.    He was stalked and referred to as “Man Candy” by supermodels Naomi Campbell, Claudia Schiffer and Cheryl Tiegs.  They pursued him relentlessly. (Apparently Chang wasn’t their type).

- Chapter 15 describes Gilbert as a hell of a coach in spite of his twisted hobbies.  We learn Gilbert was a serial peeper who documented his peeps on film.  Agassi describes Gilbert’s collection of images as quite “eclectic” but is most disturbed by his extensive collection of former Oakland Raider players and executives.

Assuming our source is correct, this autobiography is going to sizzle.  We can’t wait for November 9th and hope you enjoyed this exclusive preview of what may be coming.

Looking for a new racquet? Now could be the time to buy!

With racquet manufacturers announcing new models for 2010, now could be the best time to score a terrific deal on a current model racquet.  Technology that just a few short months ago was being touted as the most advanced in the world is either currently on sale or will be soon.  If you are in the market for a new stick, this may be the ideal time to find yourself a steal of a deal!

Now is also the time if you have a current model racquet that you enjoy hitting with to purchase a backup or two.  Due to being discontinued, they will become very difficult to find in the near future so grab one or two and stick them in your closet until needed.  By doing this now you will get them for a good price and there is a good chance you will be able to locate them with your preferred grip size.

Also, now is the time to purchase replacement grommet sets for your current racquet.  Hold onto them, because they may soon too be discontinued.  If you intend to stay with your current racquet for a few more years, make preparations to do so now.

As always we strongly encourage you to purchase racquets with healthy racquet specifications. Unfortunately racquet manufacturers produce many models that are not arm-friendly and it is essential for your uniterrupted play and enjoyment that these be avoided.  As a service to our customers we are including the following information to aid you as you select a racquet that is arm-friendly.  Note, the following suggestions are based on our observations and experience.

Stiffness: An RDC flex rating in the mid 60’s or lower.  Try to avoid any flex rating above 68.  This is the only aspect of the frame that can not be modified. We believe lower is better.  60 and lower is our ideal range.

Weight: Racquets weighing in at 11 oz  or greater tend to be healthiest.  Try to avoid racquets falling in the sub 10 oz range.  Weight can be modified.

Balance: Racquets with a headlight balance are preferred.  Even balance is acceptable.  The racquet’s balance can be modified.

Length: 27″ – 27 1/4″ is ideal.  Longer can create issues.  Length can be modified.

Wondering if your frame is healthy?  Curious about the specs of a new frame you are considering purchasing?  Ask us in the comments section of this blog and we will attempt to respond with our perception of the racquet you are considering.

Tidbit from the Grand Slam Stringer’s Symposium

Earlier this month we had the opportunity to interact with some of the top professionals in the world of racquet stringing and customization.  One particular session we found facinating was facilitated by Mr. John Elliott who flew in from France to share some of his observations and thoughts on world of poly-based strings.  During his presentation we noted the following observations he has made through his years of working with polyester strings.

- Polyester strings are sensitive to the cold.

- Basic polys offer less than 2 hours of string life.

- Luxilon ALU strings are a very high quality offering.  Similar to formula one performance racing tires in that they perform well for a short period of time and then need to be replaced.  (Optimal performance time is very limited, usually less than a match)

- Tension determines the length of the ball.  2 pounds of tension equates to 1 yard of ball length.  Increase 2 pounds to reduce length by one yard, decrease 2 pounds to increase one yard.

- Stringmeter tool is more accurate than most people give credit for.  The reason the readings vary from string to string is due to either the stringing machine or the stringer.  A number of variables can lead to inconsistency. Ideally the tension of all main (except outer most mains) strings should measure the same with this tool.

- The best playing racquet set-up for recreational and league players is a hybrid with a poly-based main and synthetic gut cross string (not a multi).

- Racquet tuning is not the same as racquet stringing.  Racquet tuning is working toward an end result…the desired stringbed stiffness.

- To tune racquet, find desired stringbed stiffness.  Ask customer to let you know when racquet is performing optimally.  Using stringmeter, measure string tension.  Increase +4 pounds for polys and +10 pounds for nylon at next stringing.  Also use Dynamic Tension readings to confirm.

- Stringing is most consistent and best when stringer uses a FLUID and REPEATABLE motion.

- With friction tension in crosses ends up measuring approx. 1/3 less in crosses than mains when strung at same reference tension.

Obviously Mr. Elliott provides much food for thought and future discussion.  We will likely find some of these very themes emerging as future individual blog entries.  As always we thank you for visiting our blog and invite you to participate by leaving your comments and questions below.

Elbow Pain B-Gone!

Guts and Glory Tennis spent last weekend attending the Grand Slam Stringer’s Symposium in FL.  We had the opportunity to speak directly with major racquet company product deisgners and product development specialists.  We came to the unfortunate conclusion that all the whining and complaining about unhealthy racquet specifications in the world is not going to change their thinking.  They deny the specs are unhealthy, preferring to blame the mechanics of the player.  They intend to continue producing lightweight, stiff frames until the public or retailers stop purchasing them.

While we will definitely try to rally support for a grassroot boycot of these products, it seems unlikely that enough support will be gathered in the short-term.  A boycott certainly does not help those currently suffering from tennis elbow.

Guts and Glory Tennis is coming to the rescue.  We will begin to offer a racquet modification service for our local stringing customers suffering from racquet related arm and shoulder pain.  We are in the process of securing the equipment to make the necessary alterations to help make your racquet more arm friendly.  The only specification of the racquet that can not be altered is the stiffness.  So, in this regard, if you are planning on purchasing a new racquet in the future, we STRONGLY encourage you to ask about the flex/stiffness rating.  We suggest an ideal range of 50’s – 60.  Measurements of 61 – 65 should also be acceptable, though not as good.  We would strongly discourage stiffness ratings above 68.